Benchmarks

Logistics Website Speed and Core Web Vitals Statistics 2026

Core Web Vitals pass rates for the platforms logistics sites run on, what 49 carrier, 3PL and logistics software home pages load, and why tracking pages share your score.

Summarize with AI
Octo Agency cover: Logistics Website Speed and Core Web Vitals Statistics 2026, with a purple hexagon pattern

Eleven of the 14 carrier, forwarder and 3PL home pages in our October 2026 sample that linked to shipment tracking sent visitors to a tracking page on the same host as the marketing site. Chrome's field data scores every page on a host together (Chrome for Developers, CrUX methodology), so for most logistics operators the Core Web Vitals score Google reports is the marketing site and the tracking tool averaged into one number.

No public dataset labels a website as a logistics company's, so this page combines the HTTP Archive's September 2026 field data for the platforms logistics sites run on with our own check of 49 home pages: 26 carriers, forwarders, brokers and 3PLs, and 23 logistics software vendors.

The thresholds, and why a logistics score is not only the marketing site

A page passes Core Web Vitals when 75% of real Chrome visits reach a Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) of 2.5 seconds or less, an Interaction to Next Paint (INP) of 200 milliseconds or less and a Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) of 0.1 or less, judged separately for mobile and desktop (web.dev).

The Chrome UX Report adds three rules that matter more for logistics than for most industries.

Every page on the host counts. Experiences on all pages of an origin are aggregated at origin level, even pages that are not publicly discoverable (Chrome for Developers). A tracking page that customers reload all day, a quote tool and a carrier login on the same host all feed the origin score.

Small pages fall back to the origin. Search Console groups similar URLs and reads the last 28 days. When a group lacks data it uses the whole origin instead, and when the origin lacks data it shows nothing (Google Search Console Help). A lane page or a service page with a few hundred visits a month is usually judged by the origin.

iPhone users are missing. The data excludes Chrome on iOS, Android WebView apps and other Chromium browsers such as Edge. Drivers and dispatchers on iPhones are not in your score at all.

Our Website Speed Statistics 2026 post covers the overall trend and the business case; the figures on load time, bounce and revenue are not repeated here.

What 49 logistics home pages are built on

We listed 60 logistics home pages across parcel and ocean carriers, freight forwarders, brokers, asset-based carriers, 3PLs and logistics software vendors, and fetched each once with curl on 2026-10-28. Ten blocked or failed the request, including UPS, FedEx, DHL, MSC, CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd, and dbschenker.com now redirects to DSV, so it was dropped as a duplicate. We identified the platform from asset paths and generator tags and checked each by hand.

Platforms behind 49 logistics home pages, October 2026
PlatformCarriers, forwarders, brokers and 3PLs (26)Logistics software (23)All 49
WordPress7714
Webflow178
Adobe Experience Manager or Sitecore415
Headless Next.js or Nuxt.js front end415
Drupal112
Other: Framer, Craft CMS, Umbraco, Optimizely, HubSpot, Sanity, Squarespace369
Not identified from the HTML606

Source: Octo Agency check of 49 home pages, 2026-10-28, raw file in our research folder

The two halves of the industry buy differently. The operators that could be identified lean on WordPress and the enterprise suites: Maersk and C.H. Robinson on Sitecore, J.B. Hunt and Old Dominion on Adobe Experience Manager. Software vendors split evenly between WordPress and Webflow, seven each, with Framer and Craft CMS behind. Six operator sites, including XPO, Saia and Landstar, gave too little away in their initial HTML to name a platform; three of those returned under 100 words of text before JavaScript ran.

Pass rates for the platforms logistics sites run on

The HTTP Archive detects the technology on each origin and joins it to Chrome's field data. September 2026 is the latest month published.

Core Web Vitals pass rate by platform, September 2026
PlatformMobile originsAll three, mobileAll three, desktopGood INP, mobileGood TTFB, mobileAll three, mobile, top 1MMedian mobile JS (KB)
All origins8,569,44652.8%60.8%79.4%45.9%46.6%714
WordPress2,658,17548.3%53.7%90.3%22.9%50.1%661
Webflow59,48371.3%82.6%88.0%73.1%49.8%904
Adobe Experience Manager19,17433.9%44.3%66.8%44.1%33.2%1,338
Sitecore5,89039.3%48.7%79.2%27.2%34.5%1,349
Next.js395,34535.7%56.9%59.7%45.6%25.5%802
Nuxt.js93,27628.8%42.2%64.1%47.0%20.7%1,039
Drupal93,19364.7%66.1%89.1%45.6%58.6%650
Framer Sites11,31970.8%87.9%80.3%69.3%42.3%797
Craft CMS10,35767.5%68.9%94.8%33.9%65.4%743
Umbraco4,33276.4%73.0%93.6%74.1%70.9%927
HubSpot CMS Hub13,90460.0%75.1%86.2%67.3%45.2%1,233

Source: HTTP Archive Core Web Vitals and page-weight technology reports, all geographies, read through the public report API on 2026-10-28. KB is 1,024 bytes.

The enterprise suites trail the web. Adobe Experience Manager and Sitecore origins pass on mobile 13 to 19 points below average and carry close to twice the median page's JavaScript. Sitecore's weak point is the server: only 27.2% of its origins have a good time to first byte.

Headless front ends fail on responsiveness. Next.js origins have good INP on mobile only 59.7% of the time, the lowest in the table, and the top-million figure drops to 25.5% passing. Four logistics operators in our sample, including Kuehne+Nagel and Uber Freight, run this kind of front end.

WordPress fails on the server. It has the third-best INP in the table at 90.3% but the worst TTFB, 22.9%, which usually points to hosting and caching rather than the theme.

We build marketing sites in Webflow, so weigh that row with our bias in mind; its lead shrinks to 3.2 points above the average among the top million origins, where sites carry more scripts. The Webflow page speed fixes we rate explain where that gap goes.

Our check reads only the initial HTML, before any JavaScript runs, so every count below is a floor: tags that a tag manager injects later are not seen.

What 49 logistics home pages reference in their initial HTML, October 2026
MeasureOperators (26)Software vendors (23)All 49
Median uncompressed HTML document139 KB368 KB227 KB
Median external script hosts1.542
Median script tags with a src91210
Google Tag Manager referenced212243
Consent manager referenced91120
HubSpot tracking or forms41115
Video file or video element81220

Source: Octo Agency check of 49 home pages with curl, 2026-10-28

Software vendors carry the marketing stack. Their home pages reference more than twice the external script hosts of operators' and are 2.6 times heavier in HTML alone. Eleven of 23 load HubSpot tracking or forms, and ZoomInfo, 6sense and Qualified appear only on software vendors' sites and two digital brokers'. The Web Almanac's 2025 third-parties chapter found at least 90% of pages use a third party, so the question is how many, not whether.

Consent managers are the most common heavy tool. OneTrust, referenced on nine of the 49, is the one with the clearest cost.

Core Web Vitals pass rate for origins carrying tools found on logistics home pages, September 2026
ToolOn our 49 home pagesMobile originsAll three, mobileAll three, mobile, top 1MMedian mobile JS (KB)
All originsBaseline8,569,44652.8%46.6%714
Google Tag Manager432,547,92046.5%44.2%1,174
OneTrust9107,24842.5%38.0%1,560
CookieYes3213,41246.6%49.7%827
Cookiebot2135,89458.0%53.6%1,139
ZoomInfo62,12039.4%33.8%1,639
Qualified21,64229.3%12.6%2,146
Google Maps0 on home pages823,80450.6%46.6%988

Source: HTTP Archive Core Web Vitals and page-weight technology reports, read 2026-10-28; first column from our check of 2026-10-28

These are correlations, not tests: a site with OneTrust and ZoomInfo is usually a larger company with many other scripts. Google Maps is absent from the home pages but common on terminal, depot and location finder pages, so check it there.

Where shipment tracking lives, and why it moves the score

For a carrier, forwarder or 3PL, tracking is the page existing customers use most, and it is usually an application, not a brochure page. Where it sits decides whether its speed is counted against the marketing site.

Where 26 logistics operators' home pages send shipment tracking, October 2026
Tracking link points toOperatorsExamples
A page or widget on the marketing host11Maersk, ONE, J.B. Hunt, Old Dominion, RXO, Echo, Expeditors and DSV (widget on the home page)
Only a separate subdomain3C.H. Robinson (online.), Kuehne+Nagel (mykn.), Landstar (websphere.)
No tracking link in the initial HTML12Includes XPO, Saia, GXO and Flexport, where menus render with JavaScript

Source: Octo Agency check of 26 operator home pages, 2026-10-28; ArcBest links both a same-host page and a subdomain and is counted once, in the first row

Same host means one shared score. For the 11 in the first row, a slow tracking search or a heavy results map lowers the origin score that every low-traffic service page falls back to in Search Console.

A subdomain separates the two. C.H. Robinson, Kuehne+Nagel and Landstar keep the marketing origin's data clean, though the tracking app is then scored on its own origin and still needs work. Moving a busy tool to a subdomain changes which number you see, not what customers feel.

What speed does to logistics leads

No published speed study covers logistics websites, so the evidence here is general and labelled as such.

Deloitte and 55 for Google. Across 37 brands and more than 30 million sessions at the end of 2019, a 0.1 second improvement in mobile speed came with a 21.6% rise in lead-generation visitors progressing to form submission and 5.5% more reaching the first form step from the home page (web.dev). A multi-step quote form is close to the journey it measured, but the study is correlational and not logistics data.

Home pages fail more often. The Web Almanac's 2025 performance chapter found 45% of mobile home pages had good Core Web Vitals against 56% of secondary pages, and 48% of mobile sites overall.

Rankings. Google's documentation, updated September 2026, says Core Web Vitals "are used by our ranking systems" but that Search shows the most relevant page even when page experience is poor. On a lane or port search, relevance comes first.

Our B2B SaaS speed benchmark covers the software side in more depth, including how the platform advantage narrows on sites with real traffic, which applies directly to the 23 vendors here.

How to use this: a five-page speed test order for a logistics site

Field data shows which pages fail, not why. We would test in this order, which follows where shippers and carriers land and where a slow page costs a quote or a load. It complements the conversion test order in Logistics Website Conversion Rate Statistics 2026.

Five-page speed test order for a logistics website
OrderPageWhy it goes hereWhat to check first
1Shipment tracking page or widgetThe most-used page for existing customers, and on most operator sites it shares the marketing originINP when a tracking number is submitted, map and results layout shift
2Request a quote or rate pageEvery new shipper passes through it, often with lane, weight and accessorial fieldsINP on mobile with the form, address autocomplete and chat loaded
3Home pageThe page most likely to fail, with the hero video, consent banner and most tagsLCP element on a first visit, video weight, number of tags before consent
4Top service or mode page (LTL, ocean, drayage)Where search traffic lands, and it usually has too few visits for its own scoreHero image size, embedded video players, consent banner shift
5Carrier sign-up or location finderCarriers apply on phones, and finders load map scriptsMap loaded on interaction, form INP, script count

Source: Octo Agency recommendation, based on the HTTP Archive, Chrome UX Report and home page findings above

For each page, read the 28-day field data in Search Console or the Chrome UX Report first, then run a lab test on a throttled mobile profile to find the cause. Test twice: as a new visitor who sees the consent banner, and with every script accepted, because many tags load only after consent.

On a rebuild we would set a budget before the content arrives: an LCP of 2.5 seconds and an INP of 200 milliseconds on mobile for the five pages above, video loaded on click or as a compressed loop under 1 MB, a facade in place of embedded players (Google's Lighthouse guidance shows a 3 KB facade standing in for a 540 KB YouTube player), and a written list of every third-party script with an owner and a reason. If the tracking tool lives on the marketing host, it needs the same budget. Our marketing websites service page explains how we scope a logistics company's site.

Frequently asked questions

How fast are logistics websites in 2026?

No dataset labels sites by industry, so the evidence is indirect. The platforms many large carriers and 3PLs use pass Core Web Vitals less often than average: Adobe Experience Manager origins 33.9% on mobile and Sitecore 39.3%, against 52.8% for all origins in September 2026 (HTTP Archive). In our check of 49 logistics home pages, software vendors' initial HTML was 2.6 times heavier than operators', with four external script hosts against 1.5.

Does a shipment tracking page affect my Core Web Vitals?

Yes, if it sits on the same host as the marketing site. Chrome's UX Report aggregates every page on an origin, including pages that are not publicly discoverable, and Search Console falls back to that origin score for pages without their own data. In our October 2026 sample, 11 of 14 operators that linked to tracking kept it on the marketing host, so its speed shapes the score of every small service page.

What Core Web Vitals scores should a logistics website aim for?

The same as any site. At the 75th percentile of visits, a Largest Contentful Paint of 2.5 seconds or less, an Interaction to Next Paint of 200 milliseconds or less and a Cumulative Layout Shift of 0.1 or less, on mobile and desktop separately (web.dev). For logistics, test INP on the tracking and quote forms first: they are where visitors type, and slow responsiveness there is what a dispatcher notices.

Which CMS is fastest for a logistics website?

In September 2026 HTTP Archive data, Umbraco origins passed Core Web Vitals on mobile 76.4% of the time, Webflow 71.3%, Framer 70.8%, Craft CMS 67.5% and Drupal 64.7%, while Adobe Experience Manager passed at 33.9% and Sitecore 39.3%. We build in Webflow, so weigh that. These averages describe the sites on each platform; your tracking tool, video and tags decide where yours lands.

Why does my logistics website show no Core Web Vitals data?

Chrome's UX Report only includes pages and origins with a minimum number of visitors, and Google does not publish the threshold. It also leaves out Chrome on iOS, Android WebView apps and Microsoft Edge, so a driver audience on iPhones is invisible. Search Console falls back to the origin when a page group lacks data, and shows nothing when the origin lacks it too.

Sources

  1. Core Web Vitals technology report: WordPress, Webflow, Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore, Next.js HTTP Archive, cwv and page-weight series for all origins and the top 1M, read through the report API at cdn.httparchive.org, the same series read for Nuxt.js, Drupal, Framer Sites, Craft CMS, Umbraco and HubSpot CMS Hub, 2026
  2. Core Web Vitals technology report API: OneTrust HTTP Archive, the same series read for Google Tag Manager, CookieYes, Cookiebot, ZoomInfo, Qualified and Google Maps, 2026
  3. Page weight technology report API: all origins HTTP Archive, the same series read for each platform and tool in the tables, 2026
  4. Performance, Web Almanac 2025 HTTP Archive, 2026
  5. Third Parties, Web Almanac 2025 HTTP Archive, 2026
  6. Web Vitals web.dev, Google, 2024
  7. CrUX methodology Chrome for Developers, Google, 2024
  8. Core Web Vitals report Google Search Console Help, 2026
  9. Milliseconds make millions web.dev, reporting the Deloitte and 55 study for Google, 2020
  10. Understanding Google Page Experience Google Search Central, 2026
  11. Lazy load third-party resources with facades Chrome for Developers, Google, 2020

Tags

  • Logistics
  • Core Web Vitals
  • Performance
  • Benchmarks
Mihajlo Stojanovic

Mihajlo Stojanovic

Co-founder, Octo Agency

Mihajlo runs the technical side of Octo Agency: Webflow builds, custom backends and the systems that keep a site editable after launch. He has shipped more than twenty Webflow sites a year as a white-label partner and writes about what survives contact with a real marketing team.

Veljko Nikolic

Reviewed by

Veljko Nikolic

Founder, Octo Agency

Veljko runs the build side of Octo Agency. He has shipped marketing sites for B2B teams in legal tech, health and manufacturing, and writes about what survives contact with a real review cycle.